Livingston
County Deputy Sheriff's
"Your
Health Care is Under Attack"
POAM - MIA?
In early December
of 2005, the Michigan Association of Police (MAP), representing
the Livingston County Lieutenants, Livingston County Sergeants,
and 911 Emergency Dispatchers, previously represented by the Police
Officers Association of Michigan (POAM), and the Michigan Association
of Public Employees (MAPE), representing the Livingston County Court
Employees, was informed that Livingston County was unilaterally
changing the terms and conditions of the collective bargaining agreements
with regard to eligibility for health care and prescription drug
coverage. The County was refusing to "effects bargain"
with regard to this unilateral change, which is required by the
Public Employment Relations Act (PERA).
MAP and MAPE
received more than thirty (30) calls from members stating that the
County threatened to eliminate health care coverage during the Christmas
holidays for those eligible and their dependents if various information
was not provided. Livingston County refused to give individuals
time to obtain the information beyond the Christmas holiday. In
addition, the County advised employees that they had to obtain the
information on their own time and at their expense.
The
members realized the necessity for the information, but took issue
with the timing and the fact that the County was requesting very
private information with regard to dependents that the County wanted
to retain. Numerous employees were concerned about the retention
of personal information that the County had previously displayed
a lackadaisical attitude.
Labor Relations
Specialists Troy Scott, Ronald Palmquist, and Patrick Baidel, in
conjunction with MAP/MAPE Labor Attorney Catherine Farrell, were
stunned to learn from County representatives the POAM agreed, without
any hesitation, to the unilateral changes with regard to this issue.
MAP/MAPE, on the other hand, with support of the Livingston County
Judges and Sherrif's Department Administration filed an unfair labor
practice charge and a lawsuit requesting a temporary restraining
order, which was scheduled to be heard in Genesee County.
After a lengthy
telephone conference, the County came to the realization that they
were in violation of the collective bargaining agreements and PERA.
The primary issue that members had concern with, turning over private
information with regard to employees and dependents, was addressed
as were the other issues. MAP/MAPE was successful in ensuring that
personal information would not be retained by the County.
In this day
and age of identity theft, MAP/MAPE led the defense of its members
and did not capitulate to the County. While POAM allowed the Country
to violate PERA and unilaterally change conditions of employment
without effects bargaining, MAP/MAPE protected our members and,
according to our motto, were "ON GUARD FOR YOUR RIGHTS."
|